<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>International Law Observer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://internationallawobserver.eu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://internationallawobserver.eu</link>
	<description>A Blog dedicated to reports, commentary and the discussion of topical issues of Public International Law as well as EC/EU-Law.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:04:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='internationallawobserver.eu' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://internationallawobserver.eu/osd.xml" title="International Law Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://internationallawobserver.eu/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>The Cambridge Companion to International Law</title>
		<link>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2012/01/26/the-cambridge-companion-to-international-law/</link>
		<comments>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2012/01/26/the-cambridge-companion-to-international-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gentian Zyberi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Public International Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internationallawobserver.eu/?p=4448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Cambridge Companion to International Law is edited by  James Crawford, University of Cambridge and Martti Koskenniemi, University of Helsinki. The book was launched today at the Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge. It provides a perfect introduction to international law from both traditional and critical perspectives. The companion brings together a group of leading [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=internationallawobserver.eu&amp;blog=1127226&amp;post=4448&amp;subd=internationallawobserver&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2012/01/26/the-cambridge-companion-to-international-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Gentian</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>December 2011 Resolution by the Assembly of States Parties on State Cooperation with the International Criminal Court</title>
		<link>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2012/01/25/december-2011-resolution-by-the-assembly-of-states-parties-on-state-cooperation-with-the-international-criminal-court/</link>
		<comments>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2012/01/25/december-2011-resolution-by-the-assembly-of-states-parties-on-state-cooperation-with-the-international-criminal-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gentian Zyberi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ICC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public International Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internationallawobserver.eu/?p=4446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post draws attention to Resolution ICC-ASP/10/Res.2, on cooperation, adopted by consensus on 20 December 2011 by the Assembly of States Parties of the International Criminal Court during its 7th plenary meeting (10th Session). There are other important resolutions adopted during the 10th Session, including that dealing with reparations (see previous post); amendments to the rule [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=internationallawobserver.eu&amp;blog=1127226&amp;post=4446&amp;subd=internationallawobserver&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2012/01/25/december-2011-resolution-by-the-assembly-of-states-parties-on-state-cooperation-with-the-international-criminal-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Gentian</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pre-Trial Chamber II Issues Confirmation of Charges Decisions in the Kenya Situation</title>
		<link>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2012/01/23/icc-pre-trial-chamber-ii-issues-confirmation-of-charges-decisions-in-the-kenya-situation/</link>
		<comments>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2012/01/23/icc-pre-trial-chamber-ii-issues-confirmation-of-charges-decisions-in-the-kenya-situation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gentian Zyberi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ICC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internationallawobserver.eu/?p=4438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pre-Trial Chamber II of the International Criminal Court composed of Judges Hans-Peter Kaul, Cuno Tarfusser and Ekaterina Trendafilova (presiding), presented an oral summary of the decisions on confirmation charges pursuant to Article 61(7)(a) and (b) of the Rome Statute in the Kenya situation. The decisions issued concern the charges of the Prosecutor against William Samoei [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=internationallawobserver.eu&amp;blog=1127226&amp;post=4438&amp;subd=internationallawobserver&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2012/01/23/icc-pre-trial-chamber-ii-issues-confirmation-of-charges-decisions-in-the-kenya-situation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Gentian</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New issue of the Goettingen Journal of International Law</title>
		<link>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2012/01/23/new-issue-of-the-goettingen-journal-of-international-law-2/</link>
		<comments>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2012/01/23/new-issue-of-the-goettingen-journal-of-international-law-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dominik Zimmermann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Public International Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relevant Literature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internationallawobserver.eu/?p=4435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new issue of the Goettingen Journal of International Law is out now. In Vol. 3 No. 3 (2011) the GoJIL pays tribute to the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and dedicates a GoJIL Focus to its legacy. Furthermore, the issue contains two articles about current developments in international law and an article discussing the [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=internationallawobserver.eu&amp;blog=1127226&amp;post=4435&amp;subd=internationallawobserver&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2012/01/23/new-issue-of-the-goettingen-journal-of-international-law-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Dominik Zimmermann</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Assembly of States Parties Requests the International Criminal Court to Establish Coherent Principles Relating to Reparations for Victims</title>
		<link>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2012/01/21/resolution-on-establishing-icc-comprehensive-principles-on-reparations/</link>
		<comments>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2012/01/21/resolution-on-establishing-icc-comprehensive-principles-on-reparations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 23:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gentian Zyberi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ICC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internationallawobserver.eu/?p=4431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The important issues dealt with during the Tenth Session of the Assembly of States Parties in New York in late December 2011 include not only the election of the ICC Prosecutor and six judges (see here), but also the adoption of a few important resolutions. This post will discuss Resolution ICC-ASP/10/Res.3 on reparations, adopted by [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=internationallawobserver.eu&amp;blog=1127226&amp;post=4431&amp;subd=internationallawobserver&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2012/01/21/resolution-on-establishing-icc-comprehensive-principles-on-reparations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Gentian</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law &#8211; Print Edition</title>
		<link>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2012/01/18/max-planck-encyclopedia-of-public-international-law-print-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2012/01/18/max-planck-encyclopedia-of-public-international-law-print-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dominik Zimmermann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Public International Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relevant Literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scholarship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internationallawobserver.eu/?p=4427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the past couple of years, we have regularly reported on the Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, the leading reference work in international law which is being prepared under the general editorship of Professor Rüdiger Wolfrum of the Max Planck Institute in Heidelberg, Germany. The Max Planck Encyclopedia has been available for some [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=internationallawobserver.eu&amp;blog=1127226&amp;post=4427&amp;subd=internationallawobserver&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2012/01/18/max-planck-encyclopedia-of-public-international-law-print-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Dominik Zimmermann</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>WIPO Diplomatic Conference on the Protection of Audio Visual Perfomances Slated for June 2012 in Beijing.</title>
		<link>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2012/01/18/wipo-diplomatic-conference-on-the-protection-of-audio-visual-perfomances-slated-for-june-2012-in-beijing/</link>
		<comments>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2012/01/18/wipo-diplomatic-conference-on-the-protection-of-audio-visual-perfomances-slated-for-june-2012-in-beijing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 06:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>innomawire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law of Treaties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internationallawobserver.eu/?p=4420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Introduction Creative control over one’s artistic endeavor is an important right that an artist strives to retain. In addition to creative control, artists seek to prevent the unlawful distribution of the creative product, insist on being acknowledged as the creator of the work, and aim to achieve adequate compensation for the creation. Through union organization, [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=internationallawobserver.eu&amp;blog=1127226&amp;post=4420&amp;subd=internationallawobserver&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2012/01/18/wipo-diplomatic-conference-on-the-protection-of-audio-visual-perfomances-slated-for-june-2012-in-beijing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">innomawire</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The ICTY Residual Mechanism</title>
		<link>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2012/01/16/the-icty-residual-mechanism/</link>
		<comments>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2012/01/16/the-icty-residual-mechanism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gentian Zyberi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ad hoc tribunals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad hoc tribunals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICTY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residual Mechanism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internationallawobserver.eu/?p=4411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In December 2011 the ICTY Registry launched a dedicated web feature (within the ICTY website) to provide a better understanding of the role and functions of the future Residual Mechanism of the Tribunal. The Residual Mechanism of the ICTY is meant to continue the important work which needs to be carried out once the Tribunal completes [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=internationallawobserver.eu&amp;blog=1127226&amp;post=4411&amp;subd=internationallawobserver&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2012/01/16/the-icty-residual-mechanism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Gentian</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 years Guantanamo: continuing the practice of detention without trial?</title>
		<link>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2012/01/11/10-years-guantanamo-continuing-the-practice-of-detention-without-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2012/01/11/10-years-guantanamo-continuing-the-practice-of-detention-without-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gentian Zyberi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International and national law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internationallawobserver.eu/?p=4406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today is the tenth anniversary of the transfer of the first detainees to the United States naval base in Guantánamo Bay, in Cuba. And with the recent adoption of the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) (section 1021) the practice of indefinite detention without charge or trial of terrorism suspects has been legalized in the US; for foreign nationals that is. [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=internationallawobserver.eu&amp;blog=1127226&amp;post=4406&amp;subd=internationallawobserver&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2012/01/11/10-years-guantanamo-continuing-the-practice-of-detention-without-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Gentian</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Decision on Challenge to Arbitrator in Chagos Dispute</title>
		<link>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2012/01/10/decision-on-challenge-to-arbitrator-in-chagos-dispute/</link>
		<comments>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2012/01/10/decision-on-challenge-to-arbitrator-in-chagos-dispute/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Harrison</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Public International Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internationallawobserver.eu/?p=4404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in December 2010, Mauritius initiated proceedings against the United Kingdom challenging the establishment of a Marine Protected Area (MPA) around the Chagos Archipelago as a violation of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.  Mauritius is expected to argue that the United Kingdom had no right to establish an MPA [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=internationallawobserver.eu&amp;blog=1127226&amp;post=4404&amp;subd=internationallawobserver&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2012/01/10/decision-on-challenge-to-arbitrator-in-chagos-dispute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">James Harrison</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
