<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Security Paradigm in the Israeli Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://internationallawobserver.eu/2009/10/30/the-security-paradigm-in-the-israeli-supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2009/10/30/the-security-paradigm-in-the-israeli-supreme-court/</link>
	<description>A Blog dedicated to reports, commentary and the discussion of topical issues of Public International Law as well as EC/EU-Law.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:45:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2009/10/30/the-security-paradigm-in-the-israeli-supreme-court/#comment-3646</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internationallawobserver.eu/?p=2776#comment-3646</guid>
		<description>Can the petitioner go anywhere else for medical treatment?  Is he just not allowed to leave his particular area?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can the petitioner go anywhere else for medical treatment?  Is he just not allowed to leave his particular area?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick S. O'Donnell</title>
		<link>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2009/10/30/the-security-paradigm-in-the-israeli-supreme-court/#comment-3637</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick S. O'Donnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internationallawobserver.eu/?p=2776#comment-3637</guid>
		<description>And I absolutely agree with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I absolutely agree with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valentina Azarov</title>
		<link>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2009/10/30/the-security-paradigm-in-the-israeli-supreme-court/#comment-3635</link>
		<dc:creator>Valentina Azarov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internationallawobserver.eu/?p=2776#comment-3635</guid>
		<description>It is for this very fact - the fact that we have indeed been over this territory before - that one should be even more baffled by its unremitting continuation. Nothing is done to challenge the situation and moreover, a certain level of credibility and stature is afforded to this very same Supreme Court in other matters such as the determination of the legality of the route of the Wall, Torture, Targeted Killings, House Demolitions, and much much more. 

The real question is whether the fact that there is nothing novel about this type of judicial practice makes the practice acceptable? And, I strongly believe that a vast majority would durably argue that it clearly does not. This is also why it is important that those who are keeping a close eye on the region at these very moments are aware of the greater context of both the prolongation and legitimation of the occupation of the Palestinian territories and, more imminently, the means available (or lack thereof) for victims to obtain justice on the national/regional level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is for this very fact &#8211; the fact that we have indeed been over this territory before &#8211; that one should be even more baffled by its unremitting continuation. Nothing is done to challenge the situation and moreover, a certain level of credibility and stature is afforded to this very same Supreme Court in other matters such as the determination of the legality of the route of the Wall, Torture, Targeted Killings, House Demolitions, and much much more. </p>
<p>The real question is whether the fact that there is nothing novel about this type of judicial practice makes the practice acceptable? And, I strongly believe that a vast majority would durably argue that it clearly does not. This is also why it is important that those who are keeping a close eye on the region at these very moments are aware of the greater context of both the prolongation and legitimation of the occupation of the Palestinian territories and, more imminently, the means available (or lack thereof) for victims to obtain justice on the national/regional level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick S. O'Donnell</title>
		<link>http://internationallawobserver.eu/2009/10/30/the-security-paradigm-in-the-israeli-supreme-court/#comment-3634</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick S. O'Donnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internationallawobserver.eu/?p=2776#comment-3634</guid>
		<description>Indeed, we&#039;ve been over this territory before; cf.: David Kretzmer&#039;s The Occupation of Justice: The Supreme Court of Israel and the Occupied Territiories (2002) or, more recently, Lisa Hajjar&#039;s Courting Conflict: The Israeli Military Court System in the West Bank and Gaza (2005).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, we&#8217;ve been over this territory before; cf.: David Kretzmer&#8217;s The Occupation of Justice: The Supreme Court of Israel and the Occupied Territiories (2002) or, more recently, Lisa Hajjar&#8217;s Courting Conflict: The Israeli Military Court System in the West Bank and Gaza (2005).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
